Being more aggressive has typically been a negative trait to the swing voters if my memory is correct. The base likes it but not the middle.
Notices |
Sadly for his relations with the rest of the world, he comes across as being as gaffe-prone as Dan Quayle. Worse, in fact. Never thought I'd ever hear myself say that. There were so many better candidates for the Republican nomination - why on earth did they choose Romney? |
The US has always liked agression, the only sugestion that it is off putting has been from Fox news in the later debates in trying to scrape together something that looked like a silver lining to the base. Though admittedly Republican agression has, at times in recent years, taken canidates into looney land, which *is* off putting. |
I meant aggressive more as in the rude and snarky type of aggression. Not assertive and confident which is how he generally was viewed in the first debate. |