I guess I don't follow your logic (which often happens).
Once the person who does not have the information discovers said information, he/she is able to relate it. At this time there is no difference between the two characters. The minor advantage to the first character is gone as they both now are able to use the information.
What am I missing? It's not like there is any penalty for the either person if the second person who later learns the information shares it.
Once the person who does not have the information discovers said information, he/she is able to relate it. At this time there is no difference between the two characters. The minor advantage to the first character is gone as they both now are able to use the information.
What am I missing? It's not like there is any penalty for the either person if the second person who later learns the information shares it.