In 184 AL Aegon IV Targaryen, king of Westeros legitimized all of his bastards as he lay dying. Among these men and women, who would become known as "Great Bastards", were Aegor "Bittersteel" Rivers, Shiera Seastar, Brynden "Bloodraven" Rivers, and most importantly Daemon Blackfyre. These four "Great Bastards" entered into the line of succession after Aegon IVs heir, Daeron II.
The year is 194 AL, ten years since the death of Aegon IV and rise of his bastards. Tension runs high in Westeros, as the kings legitimacy to the throne is called into question. Some whisper that Daeron relies too heavily on his Dornish queen, Myriah Martell. Others talk of his mothers affection for his Uncle, Aemon the Dragonknight, questioning as to who was really his father.
King's landing is the center of this, as forces begin jockeying for power in the kingdom, the tides of war on the rise as the Dance of Blackfyre begins.
__________________
Dean: Honestly, I think the world's going to end bloody. But it doesn't mean we shouldn't fight. We do have choices. I choose to go down swingin'.
Hmm I'm trying to work on a concept with a background and such...but thus far with working on another AGOT D20 character and his background I'm having a difficult time. Will try to get something posted over the next couple of days.
Could you elaborate on how this game will work. Will these be a series of personal threads that may / may not intersect? If this is meant to be a party centric game, how is it that the characters stick together (the application process seems too open for characters to have any reasonable link to each other)?
Could you elaborate on how this game will work. Will these be a series of personal threads that may / may not intersect? If this is meant to be a party centric game, how is it that the characters stick together (the application process seems too open for characters to have any reasonable link to each other)?
I envisioned it work as a bit of both. That is to say, I am not going to force players to group together into a party at the very beginning, but rather will bring them together through the story. If that makes sense. So, an example of how I see it developing might be
- A Few prologue threads in the beginning, followed by some private/small group introduction threads
- Then people's private stories are brought together around the central story. Say, one person's private goal is to become head of their house, the public story being the Blackfyre rebellion. The character then has to work towards the private goal through the public goal. If that makes sense.
So, in a way, there will be a sort of limited freedom in how characters group, or compete for that matter, in the game. I will be bringing characters together, and giving people and opportunity to form parties, but it isn't necessary for the game. If people want to play together, that can happen, or if they want to go solo, that is feasible as well.
Granted, I realize lacking strong boundaries from the get go on grouping and character will scare a good amount of people off, I don't intend on filling this quickly. I want beefy characters, who have substance and can, if need be, operate on their own, much like the source material.
Hmm any problems with a Night's Watch character...as I've been looking to play one(preferably a ranger but wouldn't be opposed to one of the steward types)?
Hmm any problems with a Night's Watch character...as I've been looking to play one(preferably a ranger but wouldn't be opposed to one of the steward types)?
Certainly not. It would be interesting, since the Night's Watch is actually moderately respected during this time, at least more so then during the novels.
And it means I get to deal with the frigid north and what lay beyond the wall.
I would most likely prefer a Ranger/Steward (Commander variety) character. But anything will work, me thinks.
I''ll likely work on something like a first ranger concept...I guess all I gotta do now is grab my books and write him up. I'll try to get a background and such done over the next few days...but I still gotta finish the background for the other game.
Would you prefer a character with a specific house affiliation or what...I was thinking maybe Stark just because it was mentioned there has been a Stark manning the wall for hundreds of years if I recall correctly? Or would you prefer if anything a minor house?
Hell come to think of it I might go with a Targaryen(mainly since I've yet to get to play one in any game), Greyjoy(just because playing them is always fun) or even Dothraki(would be interesting to see one forced into taking the black and coming into his own on the wall and such...would also be fun to roleplay in my opinion).
I think that Stark or Targaryen sound the most entertaining. Stark because they fit the wall so well, and Targaryen because when the war breaks out, I might be able to tempt you into breaking your vows!
But take your time. I look forward to seeing what you come up with.
I'm tentatively interested. Things are pretty hectic for me so I might not get an application done that I like. I'll also have to get a hold of the Green Ronin rules.