Look, you want to give me a Penalty? Fine. A straight parry detriment would be devastating, but not beyond my own fixing. Plus it would work in the stiffness he was going for with the armor. Also, consider the fact that the +4 armor would be my ONLY armor. I urge you to tell me how I'm gonna fit more armor over what you see in the picture.
You want mechanical penalty? Why? I didn't suggest an increased strength. I was offered it. I suggested raising my racial capacity, which still requires my time and devotion into raising. It'll be a LONG time coming to see that stat cap even come into play. Bedsides just the strength, most of those other abilities are common sense for most non-human races. Dwarves are likely to have infravision, as well as all other subterranean creatures. ALL creature races should have Natural Weapons, or else you're disregarding the natural order of survival.
Everything else can be taken care of by applying the Hindrance Penalty I talked about before. Again, I wasn't looking for all the cool toys I could get without penalty. I had a concept, I asked for what made sense for that concept, and I am more than willing to accept detriment that makes sense for what I'm getting.
If you had wanted to do the same, it was offered and you could have taken it. For instance, you're a faun. Fauns have horns. Natural Weapon right there. Low Light Vision makes sense for all woodland creatures. Depending on your choice of mythology, you could argue a faun as either Small or Large in size. If you headbutt someone, you could even argue having the Stun ability, again depending on your mythology. And that's just from the Monster Abilities. That isn't even taking regular Edges or Hindrances into consideration, let alone house rulings.
Don't assume that just because I am asking for a lot that I am unwilling to take a lot of detriment as well.
