Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOasysMaster
This is already a bad sign.
|
Can you explain why that is a bad sign?
To me it looks as if it may be nothing more than the acknowledgement of previous work on the same subject that came to similar conclusions, but I admit to not being familiar with those prior works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakle
The american political science professor, Richard Falk, is a pro-Palestine. He has been publicly critical of Israel for a number of years.
|
Is he 'a pro-Palestine' as a result of bias, or as a result of extensive familiarity with the issues and a reasoned response thereto?
What qualifies him as 'a pro-Palestine'?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakle
I do not care if the UN wants to investigate Israel's practices but use neutral 3rd parties to do it.
|
'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.'
- Desmond Tutu, survivor of South African Apartheid
'We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.'
- Elie Wiesel, Jewish survivor of the Holocaust
Find me a neutral 3rd party and I'll show you 'an anti-Palestine'.