@Chase
@Whytebio
Good point, in that case I'll retract that on that particular one position--I'm reminded of a similar point made by David Hume. In retrospect, asking for people to hold too strongly toward any demeanor (especially ones that goes beyond the pragmatic protocols like being civil) does strike me as going too close toward 'thought policing,' and thus undermines one of my principles.
What about, however, an "agree to disagree" protocol?
@Whytebio
Good point, in that case I'll retract that on that particular one position--I'm reminded of a similar point made by David Hume. In retrospect, asking for people to hold too strongly toward any demeanor (especially ones that goes beyond the pragmatic protocols like being civil) does strike me as going too close toward 'thought policing,' and thus undermines one of my principles.
What about, however, an "agree to disagree" protocol?