The_TFT_DM

Ah yes... dunno why I didn't think of that? This should be the sheet. These characters are pre-gens from AC-3, which I'd like to run for some friends. I'm actually think about getting the 3D Dungeon from that module printed out (I have the pdf) on card stock... Anyways, technically, they'd be "expert" characters since they are all over level 3, but it's still the D&D Basic system. I own the AD&D books and once played Keep on the Borderlands. Very sadly, that DM passed away, so I stopped playing it around that time... always intended to run a game but man I struggle sometimes to grock AD&D... or Pathfinder for that matter. I tend to run more rules light, D6 based indy games... but sometimes though require alot of work to get to something you can play.

Hello everyone! I happen to be toying around with the idea of running a game using the old 1st edition D&D Basic\Expert rules from good old Moldvay... I'm using the character sheet template to write out sheets for pre-gens from a old module... the only trouble is, I can't seem to get the AC field to fill out!? Anyone else encounter this? I must say Moldavay is such a breath of fresh air compared to so many of the contemporary (1980s) D&D and other RPG writers' rule books. Finally something decently organized and easy to understand! Don't get me wrong I love 1st Ed. AD&D, I happen to own the PHB & DM Guides, but man is it dense and hard to grock at times. And Gary had a very adversarial relationship with his players that... well maybe it made sense for his table, full of rules lawyer wargamers but it sure didn't seem very fun for me. I'd also be interested in any house rules you guys use with Moldvay... I'm tempted to add a few from Holmes for flavor or because they just seem better. I quite liked the idea of giving daggers two attacks per round, having initiative done with dex, and the five point alignment system (which seems like it's a good middle ground between the overly simplistic good-neutral-evil of Moldvay and the 9 point system we are familiar with but which also seems like it causes a lot of debate) from Holmes,